Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSoleimani, Zohreh
dc.contributor.authorZoras, Stamatis
dc.contributor.authorCeranic, Boris
dc.contributor.authorShahzad, Sally
dc.contributor.authorCui, Yuanlong
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T09:48:45Z
dc.date.available2021-02-25T09:48:45Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-18
dc.identifier.citationSoleimani, Z., Zoras, S., Ceranic, B., Shahzad, S., and Cui, Y. (2021). 'The cradle to gate life-cycle assessment of thermoelectric materials: A comparison of inorganic, organic and hybrid types'. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 44, pp. 1-12.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2213-1388
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.seta.2021.101073
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10545/625627
dc.description.abstractUsing thermoelectric generators to convert waste heat into electricity is a renewable alternative to fossil energy sources. As thermoelectric materials are the main element of thermoelectric generators, so far numerous studies have attempted to optimize their energy conversion efficiency. However, no single study to date has examined their life cycle impacts, whilst it is the most important feature of any renewable technology. Accordingly, the aim of the present study is to assess the life cycle impacts of thermoelectric materials at their production stage (cradle to gate) using a life cycle assessment tool called GaBi v.4.4. Thus, the thermoelectric materials were categorized into inorganic, organic, and hybrid types. The five investigated impact categories were resource consumption, emission, waste, primary energy demand, and global warming potential. The results confirmed that the inorganic type caused significantly greater environmental impacts than the other two types. The only inorganic exception was Bi 2 Te 3 that its environmental impact was by far the lowest among all the studied thermoelectric materials. Notably, the inorganic type caused major harm to the environment due to its extremely energy-intensive manufacturing process. However, the core environmental drawback of the organic and hybrid types was driven from their raw materials supply.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Derby REF fundingen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138821000837en_US
dc.subjectRenewable energyen_US
dc.subjectThermoelectric materialsen_US
dc.titleThe cradle to gate life-cycle assessment of thermoelectric materials: A comparison of inorganic, organic and hybrid typesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Derbyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSheffield Universityen_US
dc.identifier.journalSustainable Energy Technologies and Assessmentsen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-02-01
dc.author.detail785290en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record