Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShoesmith, Wendy
dc.contributor.authorChua, Sze Hung
dc.contributor.authorGiridharan, Beena
dc.contributor.authorForman, Dawn
dc.contributor.authorFyfe, Sue
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-28T08:27:05Z
dc.date.available2020-08-28T08:27:05Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-19
dc.identifier.citationShoesmith, W., Chua, S.H., Giridharan, B., Forman, D. and Fyfe, S., (2020). 'Creation of consensus recommendations for collaborative practice in the Malaysian psychiatric system: a modified Delphi study'. International journal of mental health systems, 14(1), pp.1-14.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13033-020-00374-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10545/625132
dc.description.abstractThere is strong evidence that collaborative practice in mental healthcare improves outcomes for patients. The concept of collaborative practice can include collaboration between healthcare workers of different professional backgrounds and collaboration with patients, families and communities. Most models of collaborative practice were developed in Western and high-income countries and are not easily translatable to settings which are culturally diverse and lower in resources. This project aimed to develop a set of recommendations to improve collaborative practice in Malaysia. In the first phase, qualitative research was conducted to better understand collaboration in a psychiatric hospital (previously published). In the second phase a local hospital level committee from the same hospital was created to act on the qualitative research and create a set of recommendations to improve collaborative practice at the hospital for the hospital. Some of these recommendations were implemented, where feasible and the outcomes discussed. These recommendations were then sent to a nationwide Delphi panel. These committees consisted of healthcare staff of various professions, patients and carers. The Delphi panel reached consensus after three rounds. The recommendations include ways to improve collaborative problem solving and decision making in the hospital, ways to improve the autonomy and relatedness of patients, carers and staff and ways to improve the levels of resources (e.g. skills training in staff, allowing people with lived experience of mental disorder to contribute). This study showed that the Delphi method is a feasible method of developing recommendations and guidelines in Malaysia and allowed a wider range of stakeholders to contribute than traditional methods of developing guidelines and recommendations.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMinistry of Health, Malaysiaen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://ijmhs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13033-020-00374-7en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Healthen_US
dc.subjectHealth Policyen_US
dc.subjectPhychiatric Mental Healthen_US
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Mental healthen_US
dc.titleCreation of consensus recommendations for collaborative practice in the Malaysian psychiatric system: a modified Delphi studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn1752-4458
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMinistry of Health, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCurtin University, Miri, Sarawak, Malaysiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Derbyen_US
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Mental Health Systemsen_US
dc.identifier.pii374
dc.source.journaltitleInternational Journal of Mental Health Systems
dc.source.volume14
dc.source.issue1
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-05-30
dc.author.detailSTF1918en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/