Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHuang, Ching-Yu
dc.contributor.authorBull, Ray
dc.contributor.authorDror, Itiel
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-17T14:07:09Z
dc.date.available2020-06-17T14:07:09Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-16
dc.identifier.citationHuang, C., Bull, R., and Dror, I. (2020). 'Applying hierarchy of expert performance (HEP) to investigative interview evaluation: strengths, challenges and future directions'. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, pp. 1-39.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1321-8719
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13218719.2020.1770634
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10545/624894
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to systematically examine the research literature on the decision of expert interviewers within the theoretical framework of the Hierarchy of Expert Performance (HEP, Dror, 2016). After providing an overview of the HEP framework, existing research in the investigative interviewing at each of the eight levels of the HEP framework is reviewed. The results identify areas of strength in reliability between experts’ observations (Level 2) and of weakness in reliability between experts’ conclusions (Level 6). Biases in investigative interview experts’ decision making is also revealed at biasability between expert conclusions (Level 8). Moreover, no published data is available in reliability within experts at the level of observations (Level 1) or conclusions (Level 5), biasability within or between expert observations (Level 3 and 4) and biasability within expert conclusions (Level 7). The findings highlight areas where future research and practical endeavor are much needed investigative interview.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipN/Aen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13218719.2020.1770634en_US
dc.subjectHierarchy of Expert Performance (HEP), Forensic/Investigative Interview, Bias, Professional Judgments, Decision Makingen_US
dc.titleApplying hierarchy of expert performance (HEP) to investigative interview evaluation: strengths, challenges and future directionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn1934-1687
dc.contributor.departmentBournemouth Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Derbyen_US
dc.identifier.journalPsychiatry, Psychology and Lawen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-04-28
dc.author.detail782679en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
HEP_in_Investigative_Interview ...
Embargo:
2021-06-16
Size:
472.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Accepted Manuscript

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record