Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPringle, Andy
dc.contributor.authorKime, Nicky
dc.contributor.authorLozano, Lorena
dc.contributor.authorZwolinsky, Stephen
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-21T10:44:07Z
dc.date.available2020-02-21T10:44:07Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-22
dc.identifier.citationPringle, A., Kime, N., Lozano-Sufrategui, L., and Zwolinsky, S. (2020). ‘Evaluating Interventions’ in Hackfort, D. and Schinke, R.J., (eds.). ‘The Routledge International Encyclopedia of Sport and Exercise Psychology: Volume 2: Applied and Practical Measures’. Abingdon: Routledge.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9781315187228
dc.identifier.doi10.4324/9781315187228
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10545/624495
dc.description.abstractPhysical inactivity has been described as a global pandemic (Andersen, Mota, & DiPetro, 2016; Tremblay et al., 2017, World Health Organisation, 2018). It is then unsurprising that bold societal and government action has been recommended to make physical activity opportunities, such as sport and exercise, desirable and accessible for all groups (Ding et al., 2016, Reis et al., 2016). Indeed, policy and initiatives have highlighted the need for investigations into both the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of community physical activity interventions (e.g., Canada Chief Medical Officer, 2016; National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, 2014; UK Chief Medical Officers’, 2019; World Health Organisation, 2018). The importance of evaluating the impact and the implementation of physical activity and public health interventions is also reported in the literature (Dunton, 2018, Mansfield 2018, Pringle, McKenna & Zwolinsky, 2018), yet putting this into practice can sometimes be challenging (Dugdill and Stratton, 2007, Department of Health, 2007, Pringle et al., 2018). Guidance is available on evaluation (Centre for Disease Control, 1999, Dugdill and Stratton, 2007, Hayes et al., 2012, Medical Research Council 2006, National Obesity Observatory, 2012, Sport England, 2006), as are several useful texts on the evaluation of physical activity interventions. In this entry, the practicalities of actually ‘doing’ the evaluation of sport and exercise-led interventions, and key learning from this process, including examples of evaluating interventions that have been reported in the peer reviewed literature, are presented. Examples of the ‘good’, and ‘not so good’ are provided with key considerations at three critical time periods of the evaluation process, including planning, implementing, and disseminating which are phases that are not mutually exclusive since many of these issues cross-over within the intervention-evaluation lifespan. However, these phases are used as an organising framework for this entry.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors were supported by their affiliated organisations to prepare this entry.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315187228en_US
dc.subjectPhysical activityen_US
dc.subjectPublic Healthen_US
dc.subjectInterventionsen_US
dc.subjectEvaluationen_US
dc.titleEvaluating Interventionsen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
dc.contributor.departmentBradford Royal Infirmaryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentLeeds Beckett Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentWest Yorkshire and Harrogate Cancer Allianceen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-11-20
dc.author.detail787106en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Pringle Kime Lozano and Zwolinsky ...
Embargo:
2021-04-22
Size:
389.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
PDF of final submitted version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record