Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHuck, Maren
dc.contributor.authorDi Fore, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorFernandez-Duque, Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-16T15:57:30Z
dc.date.available2020-01-16T15:57:30Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-10
dc.identifier.citationHuck, M., Di Fiore, A., and Fernandez-Duque, E. (2020). 'Of apples and oranges? The evolution of “monogamy” in non-human primates'. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7(472), pp. 1-25. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00472.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fevo.2019.00472
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10545/624405
dc.description.abstractBehavioral ecologists, evolutionary biologists, and anthropologists have been long fascinated by the existence of “monogamy” in the animal kingdom. Multiple studies have explored the factors underlying its evolution and maintenance, sometimes with contradicting and contentious conclusions. These studies have been plagued by a persistent use of fuzzy terminology that often leads to researchers comparing “apples with oranges” (e.g., comparing a grouping pattern or social organization with a sexual or genetic mating system). In this review, we provide an overview of research on “monogamy” in mammals generally and primates in particular, and we discuss a number of problems that complicate comparative attempts to understand this issue. We first highlight why the muddled terminology has hindered our understanding of both a rare social organization and a rare mating system. Then, following a short overview of the main hypotheses explaining the evolution of pair-living and sexualmonogamy, we critically discuss various claims about the principal drivers of “monogamy” that have been made in several recent comparative studies.We stress the importance of using only high quality and comparable data. We then propose that a productive way to frame and dissect the different components of pair-living and sexual or genetic monogamy is by considering the behavioral and evolutionary implications of those components from the perspectives of all participants in a species’ social system. In particular, we highlight the importance of integrating the perspective of “floater” individuals and considering their impacts on local operational sex ratios, competition, and variance in reproductive success across a population. We stress that pair-living need not imply a reduced importance of intrasexual mate competition, a situation that may have implications for the sexual selection potential that have not yet been fully explored. Finally, we note that there is no reason to assume that different taxa and lineages, even within the same radiation, should follow the same pathway to or share a unifying evolutionary explanation for “monogamy”. The study of the evolution of pair-living, sexual monogamy, and genetic monogamy remains a challenging and exciting area of research.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFieldwork related to the data discussed and presented here was supported through grants awarded to AD, EF-D, and their students by the Wenner-Gren Foundation, the L.S.B. Leakey Foundation, the J. William Fulbright Scholar Program, Primate conservation, Inc., Idea Wild, the National Geographic Society, as well by the New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology, New York University, the Zoological Society of San Diego, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Texas at Austin, and Yale University, as well as through grants awarded to Eckhard W. Heyman and MH by the Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft (HE 1870/10-1,2,3, HU1746-2/1). The Owl Monkey Project of Argentina was supported through the following grants to EFD: NSF-BCS-0621020, 1232349, 1503753 and 1848954; NSF-REU 0837921, 0924352 and 1026991; NSFRAPID-1219368; NIA- P30 AG012836-19, and NICHD R24 HD-044964-11.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiersen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2019.00472/fullen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectmonogamyen_US
dc.subjectpaternal careen_US
dc.subjectAotusen_US
dc.subjectCallicebusen_US
dc.subjectPlecturocebusen_US
dc.subjectPitheciaen_US
dc.subjectSaguinusen_US
dc.subjectLeontocebusen_US
dc.subjectprimatesen_US
dc.subjectpair-bondingen_US
dc.subjectpair-livingen_US
dc.titleOf apples and oranges? The evolution of “monogamy” in non-human primatesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn2296701X
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Derby, Environmental Sustainability Research Centreen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Texas at Austinen_US
dc.contributor.departmentYale Universityen_US
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Ecology and Evolutionen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-11-21
refterms.dateFOA2020-01-16T15:57:31Z
dc.author.detail782653en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
2020_Huck_et_al_2020_Of apples ...
Size:
807.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
published open access article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International