Etherotopia or a country in the mind: bridging the gap between utopias and nirvanas
AuthorsCallow, Christos Jr
AffiliationBirkbeck, University of London
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractJoyce Hertzler concludes his History of Utopian Thought with the phrase ‘Utopia is not a social state it is a state of mind’. Other utopian scholars would argue that the truth is exactly the opposite, that utopia is a purely social matter. There seems to be a false dilemma here where one must choose between two, seemingly conflicting, schools of utopian thinking: social utopias and private ones. In John Carey’s words, ‘Whereas most utopias reform the world, some reform the self’. He says of the later that these ‘solitary utopians are Robinson Crusoes of the mind, inventing islands for themselves to inhabit’ and that they are very unlike ‘normal, public-spirited utopians’. In this essay Christos Callow Jr explores the potential of a utopia that reforms both world and self and proposes Etherotopia as its name.
CitationCallow Jr., C. (2015). 'Etherotopia or a country in the mind: bridging the gap between utopias and nirvanas'. In Jones, C. and Ellis, C. (eds.), (2015). The individual and utopia: A multidisciplinary study of humanity and perfection'. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 165-179.
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International