Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHalamová, Júlia
dc.contributor.authorKanovský, Martin
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Paul
dc.contributor.authorTroop, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorZuroff, David C.
dc.contributor.authorPetrocchi, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorHermanto, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorKrieger, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorKirby, James
dc.contributor.authorAsano, Kenichi
dc.contributor.authorMatos, Marcela
dc.contributor.authorYu, FuYa
dc.contributor.authorSommers-Spijkerman, Marion
dc.contributor.authorShahar, Ben
dc.contributor.authorBasran, Jaskaran
dc.contributor.authorKupeli, Nuriye
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-30T14:50:55Z
dc.date.available2019-05-30T14:50:55Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-30
dc.identifier.citationHalamová, J., Kanovský, M., Gilbert, P., T., et al. (2019). 'Multiple group IRT measurement invariance analysis of the forms of self-criticising/attacking and self-reassuring scale in thirteen international samples'. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, pp.1-34. DOI: 10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1en_US
dc.identifier.issn08949085
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10545/623802
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to examine the measurement invariance of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) in terms of Item Response Theory differential test functioning in thirteen distinct samples (N = 7714) from twelve different countries. We assessed differential test functioning for the three FSCRS subscales, Inadequate-Self, Hated-Self and Reassured-Self separately. 32 of the 78 pairwise comparisons between samples for Inadequate-Self, 42 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Reassured-Self and 54 of the 78 pairwise comparisons for Hated-Self demonstrated no differential test functioning, i.e. measurement invariance. Hated-Self was the most invariant of the three subscales, suggesting that self-hatred is similarly perceived across different cultures. Nonetheless, all three subscales of FSCRS are sensitive to cross-cultural differences. Considering the possible cultural and linguistic differences in the expression of self-criticism and self-reassurance, future analyses of the meanings and connotations of these constructs across the world are necessary in order to develop or tailor a scale which allows cross-cultural comparisons of various treatment outcomes related to self-criticism.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipN/Aen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer USen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1#Abs1en_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10942-019-00319-1en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectself-criticismen_US
dc.subjectself-reassuranceen_US
dc.subjectmeasurement invarianceen_US
dc.subjectdifferential test functioningen_US
dc.subjectcross-cultural studiesen_US
dc.titleMultiple group IRT measurement invariance analysis of the forms of self-criticising/attacking and self-reassuring scale in thirteen international samplesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn15736563
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences Comenius University in Bratislava Slovakiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Social Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences Comenius University in Bratislava Slovakiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCentre for Compassion Research and Training College of Health and Social Care Research Centre, University of Derby, School of Sciences, Derby UKen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology and Sports Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield UKen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Economics and Social Sciences, John Cabot University, Rome, Italyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerlanden_US
dc.contributor.departmentThe School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australiaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychological Counseling, Faculty of Human Sciences, Mejiro University, Tokyo, Japanen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCognitive and Behavioural Centre for Research and Intervention, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugalen_US
dc.contributor.departmentStudent Counseling Center K-12 Education Administration, Ministry of Education, Yilan City, Taiwanen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCentre for E Health and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlandsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPaul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israelen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UKen_US
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapyen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-04-01
refterms.dateFOA2019-05-30T14:50:56Z
dc.author.detailVchi583en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Halamová2019_Article_MultipleG ...
Size:
1.037Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States