Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHalamová, Júlia
dc.contributor.authorKanovský, Martin
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Paul
dc.contributor.authorTroop, Nicholas A.
dc.contributor.authorZuroff, David C.
dc.contributor.authorHermanto, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorPetrocchi, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorSommers-Spijkerman, Marion
dc.contributor.authorKirby, James N.
dc.contributor.authorShahar, Ben
dc.contributor.authorKrieger, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorMatos, Marcela
dc.contributor.authorAsano, Kenichi
dc.contributor.authorYu, FuYa
dc.contributor.authorBasran, Jaskaran
dc.contributor.authorKupeli, Nuriye
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-29T14:02:56Z
dc.date.available2019-01-29T14:02:56Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-13
dc.identifier.citationHalamová, J. et al. (2018) 'The factor structure of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale in thirteen distinct populations', Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 40(4), pp. 736–751.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0882-2689
dc.identifier.issn1573-3505
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10862-018-9686-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10545/623431
dc.description.abstractThere is considerable evidence that self-criticism plays a major role in the vulnerability to and recovery from psychopathology. Methods to measure this process, and its change over time, are therefore important for research in psychopathology and well-being. This study examined the factor structure of a widely used measure, the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale in thirteen nonclinical samples (N = 7510) from twelve different countries: Australia (N = 319), Canada (N = 383), Switzerland (N = 230), Israel (N = 476), Italy (N = 389), Japan (N = 264), the Netherlands (N = 360), Portugal (N = 764), Slovakia (N = 1326), Taiwan (N = 417), the United Kingdom 1 (N = 1570), the United Kingdom 2 (N = 883), and USA (N = 331). This study used more advanced analyses than prior reports: a bifactor item-response theory model, a two-tier item-response theory model, and a non-parametric item-response theory (Mokken) scale analysis. Although the original three-factor solution for the FSCRS (distinguishing between Inadequate-Self, Hated-Self, and Reassured-Self) had an acceptable fit, two-tier models, with two general factors (Self-criticism and Self-reassurance) demonstrated the best fit across all samples. This study provides preliminary evidence suggesting that this two-factor structure can be used in a range of nonclinical contexts across countries and cultures. Inadequate-Self and Hated-Self might not by distinct factors in nonclinical samples. Future work may benefit from distinguishing between self-correction versus shame-based self-criticism.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWriting this work was supported by the Vedecká grantová agentúra VEGA under Grant 1/0578/15.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10862-018-9686-2en_US
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectSelf-criticismen_US
dc.subjectSelf-reassuranceen_US
dc.subjectBifactor modelsen_US
dc.subjectTwo-tier modelen_US
dc.subjectCross-cultural studiesen_US
dc.titleThe factor structure of the Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale in thirteen distinct populations.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentComenius University in Bratislavaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Derbyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Hertfordshireen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMcGill Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentJohn Cabot Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Twenteen_US
dc.contributor.departmentThe University of Queenslanden_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Jerusalemen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Bernen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Coimbraen_US
dc.contributor.departmentChiba Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMinistry of Education, Yilan City, Taiwanen_US
dc.contributor.departmentThe Compassionate Mind Foundationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity College London,en_US
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessmenten_US
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
dc.source.volume40
dc.source.issue4
dc.source.beginpage736
dc.source.endpage751
refterms.dateFOA2019-07-01T07:51:34Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
The factor structure.pdf
Size:
778.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Open access article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC0 1.0 Universal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC0 1.0 Universal