• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Research Publications
    • Business, Law and Social Sciences
    • Derby Law School
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Research Publications
    • Business, Law and Social Sciences
    • Derby Law School
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UDORACommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About and further information

    AboutOpen Access WebpagesOpen Access PolicyTake Down Policy University Privacy NoticeUniversity NewsTools for ResearchersLibraryUDo

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Mapping repeated interviews

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Waterhouse, Ridley, Bull, La ...
    Size:
    1.676Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Accepted final version
    Download
    Authors
    Waterhouse, Genevieve F.
    Ridley, Anne M.
    Bull, Ray
    La Rooy, David
    Wilcock, Rachel
    Affiliation
    University of Derby
    University of Winchester
    London South Bank University
    University of London
    Issue Date
    2018-09-14
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The present study introduces an adaptation of the Griffiths Question Map (GQM; Griffiths & Milne, 2006) which extends the chronological, visual map of question types used in an investigative interview to include child interviewee’s responses (through the addition of the Interview Answer Grid, IAG). Furthermore, it provides a rare evaluation of repeated interviews with children. From a sample of transcripts of Scottish repeated interviews with child victims, two ‘good’ and two ‘poor’ first interviews were chosen based on interviewer question types. First and second investigative interviews of these four children were mapped using the GQM and IAG in order to examine across the two interviews the similarity of interviewer and interviewee behaviours and the consistency and investigative-relevance of information provided. Both ‘good’ and ‘poor’ interviews were found to include practices discouraged by interviewing guidelines, which would not have been identified by examining question proportions alone. Furthermore, ‘good’ first interviews were followed by second interviews which began with poor question types, suggesting a possible impact of confirmation bias. Social support was also assessed and found to be used infrequently, mainly in response to the child being informative rather than pre-emptively by interviewers in an attempt to encourage this. Children were also found to disclose throughout their second interviews, suggesting that rapport-maintenance is vital for single and multiple interviews. The use of the GQM and IAG are encouraged as techniques for determining interview quality.
    Citation
    Waterhouse, G.F., Ridley, A.M., Bull, R. et al. J Police Crim Psych (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-018-9288-7
    Publisher
    Springer
    Journal
    Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10545/622996
    DOI
    10.1007/s11896-018-9288-7
    Additional Links
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-018-9288-7
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    0882-0783
    EISSN
    1936-6469
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1007/s11896-018-9288-7
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Derby Law School

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.