Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhiffin, Charlotte Jane
dc.contributor.authorEllis-Hill, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorJarrett, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, Peter J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-13T14:20:37Z
dc.date.available2017-10-13T14:20:37Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-26
dc.identifier.citationWhiffin, C. et al (2017) 'We are not the same people we used to be: an exploration of family biographical narratives and identity change following traumatic brain injury', Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 29(8). DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2017.1387577en
dc.identifier.issn9602011
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09602011.2017.1387577
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10545/621878
dc.description.abstractSubjective changes are increasingly recognised as important in recovery and rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury. Accumulation of subjective changes over time has led many to examine the question of ‘continuity of self’ post-injury. Vacillation between feeling the same and different is common and often at odds with the medical narrative preparing families for permanent change. This position of ambiguity was examined in a qualitative narrative study. The aim of this paper is to describe the narrative structures used by uninjured members of a family to understand change. These changes relate primarily, to their perspective of whether and how the injured person had changed, but also secondarily to whether and why they themselves felt they had changed in the first year post-injury. Nine uninjured family members from three families took part in three unstructured interviews during the first twelve months post-injury. In-depth narrative analysis showed family members used biographical attendance; biographical disruption; biographical continuity and biographical reconstruction to understand change. Drawing on these findings it is argued that concentrating on a narrative of change is too limiting and that engaging in biographical narratives may help humanise care provided to injured individuals and their families. Implications for research and practice are discussed
dc.description.sponsorshipN/Aen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2017.1387577en
dc.subjectTraumatic brain injuryen
dc.subjectFamilyen
dc.subjectRehabilitationen
dc.subjectIdentityen
dc.subjectChangeen
dc.titleWe are not the same people we used to be: an exploration of family biographical narratives and identity change following traumatic brain injuryen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Derbyen
dc.contributor.departmentBournemouth Universityen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Nottinghamen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Southamptonen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Cambridgeen
dc.identifier.journalNeuropsychological Rehabilitationen
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-27
refterms.dateFOA2019-01-13T00:00:00Z
html.description.abstractSubjective changes are increasingly recognised as important in recovery and rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury. Accumulation of subjective changes over time has led many to examine the question of ‘continuity of self’ post-injury. Vacillation between feeling the same and different is common and often at odds with the medical narrative preparing families for permanent change. This position of ambiguity was examined in a qualitative narrative study. The aim of this paper is to describe the narrative structures used by uninjured members of a family to understand change. These changes relate primarily, to their perspective of whether and how the injured person had changed, but also secondarily to whether and why they themselves felt they had changed in the first year post-injury. Nine uninjured family members from three families took part in three unstructured interviews during the first twelve months post-injury. In-depth narrative analysis showed family members used biographical attendance; biographical disruption; biographical continuity and biographical reconstruction to understand change. Drawing on these findings it is argued that concentrating on a narrative of change is too limiting and that engaging in biographical narratives may help humanise care provided to injured individuals and their families. Implications for research and practice are discussed


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Family_Biographical_Narratives ...
Size:
205.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Author accepted manuscript

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record