Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChan, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorBull, Ray
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-20T14:37:24Z
dc.date.available2017-07-20T14:37:24Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-13
dc.identifier.citationChan, S. and Bull, R. (2013) 'The Effect of Co-Offender Planning on Verbal Deception', Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21 (3):457en
dc.identifier.issn13218719
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13218719.2013.835703
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10545/621766
dc.description.abstractPrevious deception studies have mainly examined individual mock perpetrators and their deceptive behaviours during interviews, but not all crimes are committed by single perpetrators. In the present study, 48 mock perpetrators were individually interviewed after carrying out a mock theft in pairs. The time available for co-planning prior to the interview was manipulated so as to examine its effects on participants’: (1) verbal cues to deception; (2) cognitive load; and (3) attempted speech control during the interview. Having time available for planning was associated with greater statement immediacy, plausibility and within-pair consistency, but not with cognitive load or attempted control.
dc.description.sponsorshipN/Aen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13218719.2013.835703en
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Psychiatry, Psychology and Lawen
dc.subjectCo-offendersen
dc.subjectDeceptionen
dc.subjectPolice interviewingen
dc.titleThe effect of co-offender planning on verbal deceptionen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.eissn19341687
dc.contributor.departmentHome Team Behavioural Science Centreen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Derbyen
dc.identifier.journalPsychiatry, Psychology and Lawen
html.description.abstractPrevious deception studies have mainly examined individual mock perpetrators and their deceptive behaviours during interviews, but not all crimes are committed by single perpetrators. In the present study, 48 mock perpetrators were individually interviewed after carrying out a mock theft in pairs. The time available for co-planning prior to the interview was manipulated so as to examine its effects on participants’: (1) verbal cues to deception; (2) cognitive load; and (3) attempted speech control during the interview. Having time available for planning was associated with greater statement immediacy, plausibility and within-pair consistency, but not with cognitive load or attempted control.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record