• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Research Publications
    • Research Centres & Groups
    • The Law in Society Research Group
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Research Publications
    • Research Centres & Groups
    • The Law in Society Research Group
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UDORACommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About and further information

    AboutOpen Access WebpagesOpen Access PolicyTake Down Policy University Privacy NoticeUniversity NewsTools for ResearchersLibraryUDo

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    The enhanced cognitive interview: Testing appropriateness perception, memory capacity and error estimate relation with report quality

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Bull_2016_Enhanced_Cognitive_I ...
    Size:
    135.4Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    Accepted Manuscript
    Download
    Authors
    Paulo, Rui M.
    Albuquerque, Pedro B.
    Saraiva, Magda
    Bull, Ray
    Affiliation
    University of Derby
    Issue Date
    2015-04-23
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The Enhanced Cognitive Interview (ECI) has been widely studied. However, research has overlooked witnesses’ attitudes toward the interview and how error estimate and memory capacity relate to report quality. Participants watched a mock robbery video and were interviewed 48 hours later with either the Portuguese version of the ECI or a Structured Interview (SI). Participants interviewed with the ECI provided more information without compromising accuracy, particularly in free recall. Report accuracy was stable across interview phases and information categories. A higher perception of interview appropriateness (how witnesses evaluate the appropriateness of the interview procedure used) was linked with more detailed reports and more interest in being an interviewee. Participants over-estimated their error rate, and their memory capacity was not related to witnesses’ recall. It is essential to take into account their perception of interview appropriateness and use alternative methods to evaluate report quality. Major implications for real-life investigations are discussed.
    Citation
    Paulo, R., Albuquerque, P., Saraiva, M, Bull, R. (2015) 'The Enhanced Cognitive Interview: Testing Appropriateness Perception, Memory Capacity and Error Estimate Relation with Report Quality' Applied Cognitive Psychology 29 (4):536
    Publisher
    Wiley
    Journal
    Applied Cognitive Psychology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10545/620692
    DOI
    10.1002/acp.3132
    Additional Links
    http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/acp.3132
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    08884080
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1002/acp.3132
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    The Law in Society Research Group
    Derby Law School

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.