• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Research Publications
    • Research Centres & Groups
    • Human Sciences Research Centre
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Research Publications
    • Research Centres & Groups
    • Human Sciences Research Centre
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UDORACommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About and further information

    AboutOpen Access WebpagesOpen Access PolicyTake Down Policy University Privacy NoticeUniversity NewsTools for ResearchersLibraryUDo

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Working towards an international consensus on criteria for assessing internet gaming disorder: a critical commentary on Petry et al . (2014)

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Griffiths, Mark D. cc
    van Rooij, Antonius J.
    Kardefelt-Winther, Daniel
    Starcevic, Vladan
    Király, Orsolya
    Pallesen, Ståle
    Müller, Kai
    Dreier, Michael
    Carras, Michelle
    Prause, Nicole
    King, Daniel L.
    Aboujaoude, Elias
    Kuss, Daria J.
    Pontes, Halley M.
    Lopez Fernandez, Olatz
    Nagygyorgy, Katalin
    Achab, Sophia
    Billieux, Joël
    Quandt, Thorsten
    Carbonell, Xavier
    Ferguson, Christopher J.
    Hoff, Rani A.
    Derevensky, Jeffrey
    Haagsma, Maria C.
    Delfabbro, Paul
    Coulson, Mark
    Hussain, Zaheer
    Demetrovics, Zsolt
    Show allShow less
    Affiliation
    University of Derby
    Issue Date
    2016-01
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This commentary paper critically discusses the recent debate paper by Petry et al. (2014) that argued there was now an international consensus for assessing Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD). Our collective opinions vary considerably regarding many different aspects of online gaming. However, we contend that the paper by Petry and colleagues does not provide a true and representative international community of researchers in this area. This paper critically discusses and provides commentary on (i) the representativeness of the international group that wrote the ‘consensus’ paper, and (ii) each of the IGD criteria. The paper also includes a brief discussion on initiatives that could be taken to move the field towards consensus. It is hoped that this paper will foster debate in the IGD field and lead to improved theory, better methodologically designed studies, and more robust empirical evidence as regards problematic gaming and its psychosocial consequences and impact.
    Citation
    Griffiths, M. D. et al. (2016) Working towards an international consensus on criteria for assessing internet gaming disorder: a critical commentary on Petry et al (2014), Addiction, 111 (1):167
    Journal
    Addiction
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10545/594810
    DOI
    10.1111/add.13057
    Additional Links
    http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/add.13057
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    09652140
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1111/add.13057
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Human Sciences Research Centre

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.