Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10545/621885
Title:
No plan B: the achilles heel of high performance sport management
Authors:
Bostock, James; Crowther, Phil; Ridley-Duff, Rory; Breese, Richard
Abstract:
Research question: The severity and immediacy of funding cuts to UK National Governing Bodies of Sport (NGBs), driven by the ‘No Compromise’ policy framework for Olympic funding, triggers a cyclical need for turnaround management. Adept strategies during times of considerable challenge is stark, yet literature investigating turnaround management within NGBs remains limited. Consequently, this paper examines two questions: how do NGBs respond to UK Sport funding cuts and how are their responses enabled or restricted by their organisational context? Research methods: A case study methodology was used to develop in-depth insights into how three NGBs responded over a 12-month period of turnaround management. This was informed by 21 semistructured interviews with chief executives/presidents, performance managers/head coaches and elite athletes. The actions of the NGBs were analysed through a thematic analysis that made use of Boyne’s [2004. A ‘3Rs’ strategy for public service turnaround: Retrenchment, repositioning and reorganization. Public Money & Management, 24 (2), 97–103] 3 Rs of turnaround strategy. Results and findings: The results highlight that NGBs’ turnaround strategies were constrained by extreme funding dependency and a prohibitive institutional environment that led to states of flux and a focus on short-term operational survival. As a result, the measures taken undermined future success. Implications: An embedded feature of the ‘No Compromise’ framework is severe funding cuts. This should be a significant theme in NGB strategy development. The evidence of this study is that NGBs do not prepare, nor react strategically, when faced with the prospect (or fact of) severe cuts. Consequently, the cases of turnaround management in this study signal the urgent need for further research into the impact of the ‘No Compromise’ framework on the management of NGBs.
Affiliation:
University of Derby; Sheffield Hallam University
Citation:
Bostock, J. et al (2017) 'No plan B: the achilles heel of high performance sport management', European Sport Management Quarterly, DOI: 10.1080/16184742.2017.1364553
Publisher:
Taylor and Francis
Journal:
European Sport Management Quarterly
Issue Date:
21-Sep-2017
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10545/621885
DOI:
10.1080/16184742.2017.1364553
Additional Links:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16184742.2017.1364553
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
16184742
EISSN:
1746031X
Sponsors:
N/A
Appears in Collections:
School of Human Sciences

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorBostock, Jamesen
dc.contributor.authorCrowther, Philen
dc.contributor.authorRidley-Duff, Roryen
dc.contributor.authorBreese, Richarden
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-17T14:57:55Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-17T14:57:55Z-
dc.date.issued2017-09-21-
dc.identifier.citationBostock, J. et al (2017) 'No plan B: the achilles heel of high performance sport management', European Sport Management Quarterly, DOI: 10.1080/16184742.2017.1364553en
dc.identifier.issn16184742-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/16184742.2017.1364553-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10545/621885-
dc.description.abstractResearch question: The severity and immediacy of funding cuts to UK National Governing Bodies of Sport (NGBs), driven by the ‘No Compromise’ policy framework for Olympic funding, triggers a cyclical need for turnaround management. Adept strategies during times of considerable challenge is stark, yet literature investigating turnaround management within NGBs remains limited. Consequently, this paper examines two questions: how do NGBs respond to UK Sport funding cuts and how are their responses enabled or restricted by their organisational context? Research methods: A case study methodology was used to develop in-depth insights into how three NGBs responded over a 12-month period of turnaround management. This was informed by 21 semistructured interviews with chief executives/presidents, performance managers/head coaches and elite athletes. The actions of the NGBs were analysed through a thematic analysis that made use of Boyne’s [2004. A ‘3Rs’ strategy for public service turnaround: Retrenchment, repositioning and reorganization. Public Money & Management, 24 (2), 97–103] 3 Rs of turnaround strategy. Results and findings: The results highlight that NGBs’ turnaround strategies were constrained by extreme funding dependency and a prohibitive institutional environment that led to states of flux and a focus on short-term operational survival. As a result, the measures taken undermined future success. Implications: An embedded feature of the ‘No Compromise’ framework is severe funding cuts. This should be a significant theme in NGB strategy development. The evidence of this study is that NGBs do not prepare, nor react strategically, when faced with the prospect (or fact of) severe cuts. Consequently, the cases of turnaround management in this study signal the urgent need for further research into the impact of the ‘No Compromise’ framework on the management of NGBs.en
dc.description.sponsorshipN/Aen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16184742.2017.1364553en
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to European Sport Management Quarterlyen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectTurnarounden
dc.subjectNational Governing Bodiesen
dc.subjectRetrenchmenten
dc.subjectRepositioningen
dc.subjectReorganisationen
dc.subjectFundingen
dc.titleNo plan B: the achilles heel of high performance sport managementen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.eissn1746031X-
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Derbyen
dc.contributor.departmentSheffield Hallam Universityen
dc.identifier.journalEuropean Sport Management Quarterlyen
dc.contributor.institutionCollege of Life and Natural Science, University of Derby, Derbyshire, UK-
dc.contributor.institutionSheffield Business School, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK-
dc.contributor.institutionSheffield Business School, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK-
dc.contributor.institutionSheffield Business School, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK-
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in UDORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.