Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10545/621043
Title:
The structure of argument: Semantic mapping of US supreme court cases
Authors:
Murtagh, Fionn ( 0000-0002-0589-6892 ) ; Farid, Mohsen
Abstract:
We semantically map out the flow of the narrative involved in a United States Supreme Court case. Our objective is both the static analysis of semantics but, more so, the trajectory of argument. This includes consideration of those who are involved, the Justices and the Attorneys. We study therefore the flow of argument. Geometrical (metric, latent semantic) and topological (ultrametric, hierarchical) analyses are used in our analytics.
Affiliation:
University of Derby
Citation:
Murtagh, F. and Mohsen, F. (2015) 'The structure of argument: Semantic mapping of US supreme court cases', in Gammerman, A et al. (Eds.) 'Statistical learning and data sciences', Springer: Switzerland, pp. 397-405
Publisher:
Springer
Issue Date:
3-Apr-2015
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10545/621043
DOI:
10.1007/978-3-319-17091-6_34
Additional Links:
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-17091-6_34; http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-17091-6/
Type:
Meetings and Proceedings
Language:
en
ISBN:
9783319170909
Appears in Collections:
Department of Electronics, Computing & Maths

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorMurtagh, Fionnen
dc.contributor.authorFarid, Mohsenen
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-23T14:52:46Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-23T14:52:46Z-
dc.date.issued2015-04-03-
dc.identifier.citationMurtagh, F. and Mohsen, F. (2015) 'The structure of argument: Semantic mapping of US supreme court cases', in Gammerman, A et al. (Eds.) 'Statistical learning and data sciences', Springer: Switzerland, pp. 397-405en
dc.identifier.isbn9783319170909-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-319-17091-6_34-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10545/621043-
dc.description.abstractWe semantically map out the flow of the narrative involved in a United States Supreme Court case. Our objective is both the static analysis of semantics but, more so, the trajectory of argument. This includes consideration of those who are involved, the Justices and the Attorneys. We study therefore the flow of argument. Geometrical (metric, latent semantic) and topological (ultrametric, hierarchical) analyses are used in our analytics.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.urlhttp://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-17091-6_34en
dc.relation.urlhttp://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-17091-6/en
dc.subjectData analyticsen
dc.subjectMultivariate data analysisen
dc.subjectCorrespondence analysisen
dc.subjectLatent semantic analysisen
dc.subjectHierarchical clusteringen
dc.subjectMetric and ultrametric mappingen
dc.titleThe structure of argument: Semantic mapping of US supreme court casesen
dc.typeMeetings and Proceedingsen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Derbyen
All Items in UDORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.