All that Glisters is not Gold: Sensory Bias, Sexual Conflict and Nuptial Feeding in Insects and Spiders

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10545/592775
Title:
All that Glisters is not Gold: Sensory Bias, Sexual Conflict and Nuptial Feeding in Insects and Spiders
Authors:
Vahed, Karim
Abstract:
It is becoming increasingly clear that the evolutionary interests of the sexes are often in conflict when it comes to mating. Sexual encounters involving nuptial gifts, however, have often been viewed as prime examples of sexual co-operation, rather than conflict. In this review, I explore the proposition that nuptial gifts act as sensory traps: by exploiting the female's gustatory responses, the male may be able to entice females to accept superfluous matings and/or transfer greater volumes of ejaculate than are in the female's reproductive interests. Evidence suggests that the females' sensory biases may have played an important role in shaping gift characteristics in at least four different systems, although relatively few forms of nuptial feeding have so far been examined from this perspective. I argue that gift composition is more likely to be tailored to increasing the attractiveness of the gift to the female and/or maximizing gift handling time than to suit the female's nutritional needs and that the fecundity-enhancing benefits of nuptial gifts are often questionable and have been over-stated in the literature. Fertilization biases associated with the female's attraction to the nuptial gift, however, could lead to in-direct benefits for the female. On the other hand, nuptial feeding may also lead to significant costs to the female. Evidence suggests that some types of gift entice the female to mate, but it is not clear whether the resultant degree of polyandry is higher than optimal for the female. In other cases, evidence suggests that the gift enables the male to overcome the resistance of the female to accepting an extra large ejaculate and that large ejaculates are associated with longer post-mating sexual refractory periods in the female. This could represent a cost to the female by delaying or preventing her from receiving the genetic benefits of polyandry. At present, it is not clear, however, whether such costs outweigh the potential benefits of nuptial feeding for the female.
Affiliation:
University of Derby
Citation:
Vahed, K. (2007), All that Glisters is not Gold: Sensory Bias, Sexual Conflict and Nuptial Feeding in Insects and Spiders. Ethology, 113: 105–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01312.x
Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Ethology
Issue Date:
Feb-2007
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10545/592775
DOI:
10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01312.x
Additional Links:
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01312.x
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
0179-1613; 1439-0310
Appears in Collections:
Environmental Sustainability Research Centre

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorVahed, Karimen
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-04T14:22:21Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-04T14:22:21Zen
dc.date.issued2007-02en
dc.identifier.citationVahed, K. (2007), All that Glisters is not Gold: Sensory Bias, Sexual Conflict and Nuptial Feeding in Insects and Spiders. Ethology, 113: 105–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01312.xen
dc.identifier.issn0179-1613en
dc.identifier.issn1439-0310en
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01312.xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10545/592775en
dc.description.abstractIt is becoming increasingly clear that the evolutionary interests of the sexes are often in conflict when it comes to mating. Sexual encounters involving nuptial gifts, however, have often been viewed as prime examples of sexual co-operation, rather than conflict. In this review, I explore the proposition that nuptial gifts act as sensory traps: by exploiting the female's gustatory responses, the male may be able to entice females to accept superfluous matings and/or transfer greater volumes of ejaculate than are in the female's reproductive interests. Evidence suggests that the females' sensory biases may have played an important role in shaping gift characteristics in at least four different systems, although relatively few forms of nuptial feeding have so far been examined from this perspective. I argue that gift composition is more likely to be tailored to increasing the attractiveness of the gift to the female and/or maximizing gift handling time than to suit the female's nutritional needs and that the fecundity-enhancing benefits of nuptial gifts are often questionable and have been over-stated in the literature. Fertilization biases associated with the female's attraction to the nuptial gift, however, could lead to in-direct benefits for the female. On the other hand, nuptial feeding may also lead to significant costs to the female. Evidence suggests that some types of gift entice the female to mate, but it is not clear whether the resultant degree of polyandry is higher than optimal for the female. In other cases, evidence suggests that the gift enables the male to overcome the resistance of the female to accepting an extra large ejaculate and that large ejaculates are associated with longer post-mating sexual refractory periods in the female. This could represent a cost to the female by delaying or preventing her from receiving the genetic benefits of polyandry. At present, it is not clear, however, whether such costs outweigh the potential benefits of nuptial feeding for the female.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.relation.urlhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01312.xen
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Ethologyen
dc.subjectNuptial giftsen
dc.subjectSexual conflicten
dc.titleAll that Glisters is not Gold: Sensory Bias, Sexual Conflict and Nuptial Feeding in Insects and Spidersen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Derbyen
dc.identifier.journalEthologyen
All Items in UDORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.