Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10545/623024
Title:
Remote working in academia: a site of contested identities.
Authors:
Lee, Amanda ( 0000-0002-6708-4566 )
Abstract:
This development paper discusses the affects and impact of formalised remote (location-independent) working on notions and construction of academic identity. Data is drawn from a six year longitudinal ethnographic study exploring the lived experiences of location-independent and office-based academics. Findings suggest academic identities are being dynamically recreated, with a more or less conscious awareness of how this is being done. The organisational decision to formalise location-independent working (LIW) led to a distinct group of academics identifying themselves as ‘LIW’ and office-based academics identifying themselves as distinct from their LIW colleagues. The dynamic interplay between LIW and office-based academics resulted in contested identities between these two groups. Despite these manufactured and socially constructed divisions, both groups identified strongly with the notion of an overarching academic identity. As such, the notion of academic identity was not contested, but it was seen as threatened and, potentially weakened, by the prevailing managerialist culture.
Affiliation:
University of Derby
Citation:
Lee, A. (2018) ‘Remote working in academia: a site of contested identities’, Presented at the British Academy of Management Annual Conference, Bristol Business School, 4-6th September.
Publisher:
British Academy of Management
Issue Date:
1-Sep-2018
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10545/623024
Additional Links:
http://conference.bam.ac.uk/BAM2018/htdocs/conference_papers.php?track_name=Identity
Type:
Working Paper; Meetings and Proceedings
Language:
en
Sponsors:
N/A
Appears in Collections:
Derby Business School

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Amandaen
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-09T10:48:45Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-09T10:48:45Z-
dc.date.issued2018-09-01-
dc.identifier.citationLee, A. (2018) ‘Remote working in academia: a site of contested identities’, Presented at the British Academy of Management Annual Conference, Bristol Business School, 4-6th September.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10545/623024-
dc.description.abstractThis development paper discusses the affects and impact of formalised remote (location-independent) working on notions and construction of academic identity. Data is drawn from a six year longitudinal ethnographic study exploring the lived experiences of location-independent and office-based academics. Findings suggest academic identities are being dynamically recreated, with a more or less conscious awareness of how this is being done. The organisational decision to formalise location-independent working (LIW) led to a distinct group of academics identifying themselves as ‘LIW’ and office-based academics identifying themselves as distinct from their LIW colleagues. The dynamic interplay between LIW and office-based academics resulted in contested identities between these two groups. Despite these manufactured and socially constructed divisions, both groups identified strongly with the notion of an overarching academic identity. As such, the notion of academic identity was not contested, but it was seen as threatened and, potentially weakened, by the prevailing managerialist culture.en
dc.description.sponsorshipN/Aen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBritish Academy of Managementen
dc.relation.urlhttp://conference.bam.ac.uk/BAM2018/htdocs/conference_papers.php?track_name=Identityen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectRemote workingen
dc.subjectAcademic identityen
dc.titleRemote working in academia: a site of contested identities.en
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.typeMeetings and Proceedingsen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Derbyen
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in UDORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.